WHAT WENT WRONG?
RHYL 3 NEWI CEFN DRUIDS 4 - THE INQUEST
HOW can a team which looked so outstanding in beating full-timers TNS then end up losing and conceding four goals at home to a team which is never going to pull up any trees in the Welsh Premier six days later?
In their previous 15 matches the meanest defence in the WPL by a country mile had let in a mere nine goals.
So how can Rhyl account for last night's defeat?
Well firstly, was it that much of a surprise?
Only a month ago we'd seen the Lilywhites crash 3-2 at home to another team of supposed no-hopers in Port Talbot. That day, too, Rhyl's defence strangely went missing.
Perhaps that one could be put down as a one-off, but for it to happen again in such a short space of time begs the question does this Lilies team truly have what it takes to win the Welsh Premier League?
The key to winning titles is consistency. Okay, Rhyl have lost only twice in 16 starts which is good form but the manner of those defeats was worrying.
Former manager John Hulse would often complain of teams coming to Belle Vue to put 10 men behind the ball and play for a point.
However, that could certainly not be said of Port Talbot and Druids who, when they were allowed to, had a real go and, just as importantly, believed in themselves.
Perhaps visiting teams, now wise to the fact this Rhyl side is probably the most exciting ever to feature in the Welsh Premier in an attacking sense, decide to meet fire with fire, realising that if they venture forward they will get chances themselves.
A similar scenario to the Manchester United sides of recent times; all-out attack but they'll always give you a few opportunities of your own - a "you score three and we'll score four" attitude.
There can be no criticising Rhyl's attacking performance against Druids. Had it not been for their keeper Mullock, the Lilywhites would have won. The fact Allan Bickerstaff's side had 29 goal attempts and 14 on target is testament to that.
The conditions also definitely played a part, but it seems that last night Rhyl paid the price for playing two attacking full-backs. It was alarming to see Druids have so many one-on-ones.
Personally, I feel Rhyl look more solid defensively with Chris Roberts at left-back and Paul O'Neill has proved many times he can be effective in the right-back role.
Their inclusion would perhaps allow Stones and Connolly to fulfill more suited attacking berths, although that would then mean players being dropped to accommodate them.
Again last night, detractors of Josh Johnson were given ammunition for their argument that he's a luxury player.
The Trinidad and Tobago international can be devastating as we all know, but last night up against an ageing Wayne Phillips he really should have been more effective. The jury is still out on whether Johnson should be a starting regular.
Rhyl have proved they are title material on many occasions this season. In their battles with the other members of the "big four" they have been in a different class - hammering Llanelli 5-1, defeating TNS 3-0 and Bangor City 2-0.
But it's no good just raising your game for the bigger sides. It's a much overused cliche but there really are no easy games in this league. The teams near the bottom like Druids will scrap to survive, give them an inch and they'll take the proverbial mile.
Rhyl are still in a good position but they cannot afford too many more slip ups like last night.
The players undoubtedly have the ability, it's up to them to display it consistently.
Older/Newer
« HOLYWELL TOWN v RHYL RESERVES | TOTALLY USELESS INFORMATION - VOLUME FIVE »
0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: WHAT WENT WRONG?.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://lilywhites.northwalesblogs.co.uk/cgi-bin/mt421/mt-tb.cgi/100064



I think you've said it all in that appraisal Dave. Greg Stones is a superb player and there is no way I would not have him in the team, but if you moved him upfield to accommodate Chris Roberts who would you leave out?
Josh Johnson, though potentially brilliant, has too many off games and it is hard to justify his inclusion in a starting eleven. Maybe as a sub to come on when the opposition are even more vulnerable to his pace?
I would like to see Carl Owen featuring more, but we must remember that there are no bad players in the team that has done so well this season; so again who do leave out? I would hope that we can keep Carl in the squad however.
Let's just hope that we can learn from last night, and that we don't have any more slip ups from now on.
We were fortunate that the other two lost as well; we cannot rely on them dropping any more points and it's up to us to prove ourselves the best in the league, against any opposition.
Give some credit to Druids, they played 3 up front with plenty of width and Ricky Evans stayed high up the pitch too. Whenever we lost the ball it was switched quickly out wide into the space vacated by our full backs and they got a huge amount of joy out of it.
Its very hard to criticise an approach that has been like a breath of fresh air when it goes wrong but on another day we could have won 9-5. Maybe against some teams playing this system we might need to tighten things up a little but at we've proabaly scored about 16 more goals than we had at this stage last season and I know which style I prefer to watch
More or less spot on that,as Craig says though credit to Druids for a really good positive performance. Despite disappointment at the result it was a hell of a good game to watch and 9 times out of 10 we'd have beaten them.
Granted not all doom and gloom as other key results went with us, granted Druids came to play not frustrate, but come on guys how many inept displays can we hope to get away with especially at home if we are to be considered serious title challengers? I agree Craig, an usual 'rock solid' defence had a real case of the jitters whenever Druids came forward, Stones and Connolly as against Port Talbot seemed to stuggle against nippy small wingers who enjoyed the acres of space they were granted and when we did get close skipped past with ease. I must reiterate my season long thoughts that Connolly shows defensive naivety and forays forward usually result in long overhit crosses sailing beyond our forwards? The left back spot should go to Chris Roberts he deserves a place. DGW is spot on whereas I like Johnson's direct running which at times excite, but over 90 minutes is far too inconsistent and can't justify a regular starting slot. Never thought I would say it but I felt we missed Danny Williams on Saturday, his calming influence and his selection of easy simple passes as against TNS was sorely missed. I'm afraid Gareth Wilson could have been tagged the 'invisible man' and should never be considered other than for a cameo substitue spot at the best. Anyway on the plus side for the neutral it proved a cracking match, goals in abundance, mistakes galore and and 'Gareth Wilson'!
I think we should be more professional than accept that playing in an attacking manner means that every now and again you're going to get caught out defensively and that's life. The whole idea of having two wingers is surely not to over-commit the FBs going forward. Otherwise you have a wing-back and an extra midfielder. It can't be too much to instill a discipline that you cover for a team-mate who's venturing forward.
JDH is right in that neither Conno nor Stones have been accustomed to playing FB for the last year or so. We don't have full-time players and training and so positional instinct will often take over. Willo can do what he does (as shown against Bohemians) outstandingly well but no-one would claim that he's consistent.
What form does training take ? Do we have a defensive coach as such ? Conceding 8 goals in 3 home games can't just be shrugged off.
If you actually analyse the goals we conceded 3 of them were down to individual errors.
For the 1st everyone just switched off for a quickly taken free kick, the 2nd was a corner that we had at least 3 attempts to clear not 1 of which cleared the area and the 4th Conno made a right howler.
I agree we missed Danny Williams. If you watch in a lot of games where the full backs are up field he slots into the centre half position to make 3 at the back allowing the centre halves to cover out wide a little better. That wasn't in evidence much the other night.
I've been saying for weeks that we look better with a 3 man midfield. At the moment we haven't got much coming from the left hand side of midfield. Reedy when he plays there looks uncomfortable and Josh might as well not have been on the field the other night. If as it seems Kelly is on his way then we definitely need another midfielder in next month.
Still we're top scoring goals and playing good football. I can think of worse positions to be in